Julianne Malveaux on Business and Economics

 

TRAGEDY AND TRAVEL COSTS

BY JULIANNE MALVEAUX

 

            A few months ago, I was at an African airport, overloaded with two large carry-on bags and a purse.  I knew that I was pushing the limit, but I was a sister headed back from the Motherland, so what was I to do but shop?  As loaded down as I was as I prepared for my departure, my attention was riveted by a store that displayed a few baubles and shells.  So I left my bag in my chair and rose to check the merchandise out.

 

            I had hardly moved three steps when an armed security guard ran up to me and hollered, in staccato tone, “Madame, where are you going without your bags.” I was as laid back as he was hyper, so I smiled and said, “I’m just walking over here to check out the jewelry.”  “No,” he said, “You have to take your bag with you.”  I was still in friendly mode, and under the illusion that this man could be charmed.  “I’m just going over there,” I said.  “I won’t be but a minute.”  He grabbed my arm so hard it hurt ten minutes after he let go.  “Do you see the sign,” he said, spinning me around. “It says do not leave your bag unattended.  If you leave your bag here, I will have to confiscate it.”  Chastened, I sat down and complained to another passenger, “Well he didn’t have to be so mean.”  The older woman, African and clearly well traveled, smiled at me indulgently.  “He is only doing his job,” she said, “We have to worry about terrorists.”

 

            I chafed for a while, but forgot the incident after I boarded the plane.  But it came roaring back to mind on September 11 when four planes were hijacked, with two crashing into the World Trade Center, and one into the Pentagon.  It is rumored that the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania might have been headed for Camp David.  How did someone get on a plane with knives? What kind of security lapses were there at Logan, Newark and Dulles airports?  I watched a security expert explain that “harmless looking knives” (run that one by me again) might be allowed past airport security.  And I realized that the rest of the world has always been much more security conscious than the United States is.

 

            From a labor market perspective, it is also clear that we don’t place much value on the security function at United States airports.  The position seems to be an entry-level position that doesn’t pay especially well, and to borrow an adage, “You get what you pay for.”  To be sure, we impatient Americans don’t want more complicated security.  But Tuesday’s events suggest that we need more complicated security, and perhaps a better trained security force.

 

            We may also need to pay more money for our plane tickets.  All summer I’ve been inundated with e-mail offers for cheap tickets, opportunities to cross the country and come back for less than $300.  To be sure the fine print makes these deals a bit less attractive than they seem.  But how much security can airlines really pay for when they are hawking cut-rate tickets.  Some airports have “facility surcharges” but they are rarely more than $4.  Are we skimping on security costs?

 

            By converting airports into mini-malls, are we also increasing security risks?  At Washington DC’s National Airport, you can grab a good meal at Legal Seafood’s or the California Pizza Kitchen, shop at a couple of bookstores, and buy shoes, clothes, or leather goods.  These stores are successful because of enormous foot traffic, not only from passengers, but also from their friends who come to the airport to shop and see them off.  While ticket holders have to be identified, those who travel with them do not.  The foot traffic that supplements an airport facility’s bottom line may be inconsistent with the strict security needed, especially at this time.

 

            The unfortunate conclusion is that air travel ought to cost us a bit more than it does, both to defray increased security costs and to defray the lost revenue that will come when airport foot traffic is restricted.  This isn’t good news for a frequent flyer like me, but it’s the reality that the rest of the world has been dealing with for decades.  The fight against international terrorism isn’t a costless fight, and until now, the United States has used its air of invincibility to avoid shouldering its burden.  We paid a horrible price to get a needed wake-up call. 


Back