Julianne Malveaux Commentary

 

IGNORANT INTELLIGENCE

BY JULIANNE MALVEAUX

 

            What’s up with the Central Intelligence Agency?  If one looks carefully at their record in past years, one can only suggest that their intelligence is of the tremendously deficient kind.  They publish little information publicly, hiding behind the fact that they have to keep secrets from the public.  But even Ray Charles can see that the CIA emperor is walking around nude.  They’ve got a bloated budget, brim over with inefficiency, and may have had their heads so firmly in the sand that they ignored information that might have prevented the terrorism of September 11.

 

                After the World Trade Center was attacked in 1993, after all, didn’t anybody think that the same forces would try it again?  After embassies were bombed two years ago, did anyone think that Osama bin Ladin was finished with his jihad against the Untied States?  The CIA is supposed to know what’s going on, but they’ve used obfuscation and alarm to avoid providing complete information to the public.  They argue we don’t need to know, but their b udgets suggest that we need to pay.  Imagine that any other organization of government had $30 billion to burn and no need to justify expenditures!

 

                It’s not just the CIA.  There are more than 13 agencies which provide strategic foreign intelligence under the National Foreign Intelligence Programs.  All of them fight turf wars, and few of them talk to each other.  Supposedly, Homeland Security chief Tom Ridge is to coordinate these efforts. Every time he addresses the issue of coordination, though, he is vague and insubstantial.  Is Ridge bigger than bureaucracy?  Probably not.

 

                Congressional oversight of “intelligence” is as diffuse as intelligence activities themselves.  Perhaps a dozen Congressional committees provide some form of oversight.  There are Senate and House Committees on Intelligence, on Terrorism, on Security, and never the twain shall meet.  With overlapping intelligence and oversight, it appears that the left hand really doesn’t know what the right hand is doing.

 

                Perhaps they felt no need to know, or to coordinate.  With our nation in a state of subdued panic, intelligence agencies can get away with almost anything, and they have.  In the name of security, we have suspended a whole set of civil liberties, suspending the concept of habeas corpus, and making attorney-client privilege a thing of the past.  With the national mood pushing a false sense of unity, people are more likely to give up their own power than to criticize the misuse of power on the part of our nation’s intelligence agencies.

 

                Still, it seems that we ought to recognize how ignorant our intelligence has been.  Despite the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center, and the conviction of it perpetrators, we have done little to improve our ability to translate Arabic documents or to recruit agents who speak Arabic.  Too many say that we’d have to recruit “unsavory characters,” or the criminals of the world, but that’s not necessarily the case.  Couldn’t we have grown a cadre of translators in an 8-year period since 1993?  With the right career and financial incentives, we might have identified a hundred, or a thousand, folks who could be trained in Arabic language and translation.  We didn’t do it because we didn’t think we had to.  WE had enough electronic surveillance to find anything out (as long as it was transmitted in English).

 

                Electronic surveillance seems no substitute for human intelligence.  I don’t know which computer failed to predict Iran’s invasion of Kuwait before the Gulf War started.  It was common knowledge that Iraqi forces were building up along the Kuwaiti border.  Did we think people were gathering there for a tea party?  Electronic surveillance did not confirm the invasions, but common sense might have.  Somehow our “intelligence” agencies dropped the ball.

 

                Citizens might raise more questions but we have moved into a “by any means necessary” mentality, one that will allow the CIA mistakes and intrusions into our civil liberties because we feel we cannot do any better.  WE feel that we have to accept this agency’s abuses because there is no other agency that can keep order, peace, and knowledge.  Indeed, some Congressional proposals would provide the CIA with more power, not less, rationalizing that this agency has the best chance of coordinating the work of all the other intelligence agencies.

 

                We give up our citizenship rights, though, when we shrug off the ignorance of our intelligence agencies and assume that we can do no better.   We need intelligence, but we also must have accountability and efficiency.  We need to know what we spend on intelligence, and we need to know why the CIA so frequently drops the ball on “intelligence” matters.  Otherwise, we accept an ignorant intelligence that goes thought the motions, spends the money, and yields only faulty results.


Back